BRZEZINSKI: FROM OSAMA TO OBAMA

BRZEZINSKI: FROM OSAMA TO OBAMA
A BABYLON OBSERVER OBSERVATION

WWW, March 2009 - Everybody knows the photo's and video's where Donald Rumsfeld shook hands with Saddam Hussein. Pretty soon, everyone will see the photo's of one of Obama's main advisors having a chat with another well known figure: Osama Bin Laden.

In the Game of Global Engineering, there are many players and they all know each other as they play their wicked games of chess at the costs of the people of the world and indeed, at the cost of creation as a whole.

It's a "Grand Chessboard", according to one of Barack Obama's top advisors, a man with the difficult name Zbignew Brzezinski. After all, that is the title of one of his books. In the 1970's, Brzezinski was the top advisor for then president Jimmy Carter. He is sometimes called "the other Henry Kissinger", and like ole Henry, Zbignew surely has some things on his CV that he doesn't want everyone to know as well.

In many ways, you could look at him as the founder of what is currently known as the Taliban or even Al Qaeda. Sure, there really is no such thing as Al Qaeda, but there is such a thing as Muslim fundamentalists in Afghanistan and we are led to believe that these are the archenemies of "freedom and democracy".

We are also led to believe that the chief terrorist of the world is the leader of this Al Qaeda organization, a man called Osama Bin Laden. He is said to be responsible for just about every terrorist act in the world, and subsequently he's seen as the most wanted man on earth.

Osama Bin Laden, however, is a long time friend of the USA and he was even trained by the US led armies, such as the one in Pakistan. He was also a good friend of a man who wasn't really on the front of the world's theatre recently, but who you can see in the picture below:

Brzezinski can be seen here as he is having a chat with what is now seen as the world's most wanted man. The man who is now one of Obama's top advisors was the man who founded what now is the Taliban and Al Qaeda: the Muslim fundamentalists in Afghanistan that this very same Obama wants to vehemently bomb.

Of course, that other picture comes to mind, where one of the head figures in the Bush administration was caught on camera decades before, as he was building up the system of the dictator that was later called "the biggest threat to the free world" as he had Weapons of Mass Destruction. This one:

It's a "Grand Chess Board" indeed. Brzezinski did not only write a book with that title, he is one of the players of this game, a game that has the deaths of countless of innocent men women and children as a result. Being one of the top advisors for the president that so many seem to looking at as the Messiah who will take the USA and indeed the world out of the wars, in reality he is proof of the fact that president Obama is not what many think he is.

"IN THE BEGINNING": 6000 YEARS AND 6 DAYS AGO?

"IN THE BEGINNING": 6000 YEARS AND 6 DAYS AGO?
MESSIAN DREAD SPIRITUAL MEDITATION

WWW, March 2009 - Is the King James Version 100% correct, when the translation seems to indicate that JAH created creation about 6000 years ago, in a state of desolation?

"Yes", say the Creationist. I beg to differ, however.

Creationism", unlike the popular idea, is not "just" the knowledge that creation was created by the Creator. If that would be the case, I could have been labeled a "Creationist" myself. However, I am not. And still, I believe that Jah created creation and no I do not believe that he did that through Darwin, so to speak. I do not believe mankind comes from the proverbial monkey.

A creationist believes, however, using slogans like "the Bible is the Whole Truth", that God created creation in 6 days, about 6000 years ago. A creationist believes in the traditional doctrines that came to us through Augustine, the Vatikan and it's "Reformers". A Creationist believes, that "in the beginning", the first words of the Bible, is also the "first day" of the week described in the first chapter of Genesis.

And I beg to differ, Sirs!

First of all, the Bible does not say at all that "In the beginning was the first day" at all. In fact, Genesis starts with the words:

"In The Beginning, God Created The Heaven And The Earth. And The Earth Was Without Form, And Void, And Darkness Was Upon The Face Of The Deep." (Genesis 1:1,2a)

When you read on, you see that Jah wipes the darkness of the earth and makes a difference between day and night. That wiping away of the darkness is the first act of the "creation week", which I would rather call a re-creation week.

First of all, the word "was" is not necessarily translated in the right way. The word could also be "became". Whether you use the word "was", or "became", therefore, requires more than literally translating the first lines of Genesis.

When you translate the word as "was", you make Genesis say, that Jah created the earth without "form and void", or, as the Hebrew phrase goes, "Tohu va Bohu". This phrase is used in the Bible only a couple of times, so let's take a look where they are used as well.

Let's go to Isaiah, where Jah speaks about His judgments:

"He shall stretch out upon it the line of confusion, and the stones of emptiness" (Isaiah 34:11b)

Obviously, since you cannot "create destruction" and Tohu va Bohu does indicate destruction rather than a creative act, it is not right to translate the first lines of Genesis using the word "was" to describe the original state of creation "in the beginning".

But there is more usage of the word Tohu va Bohu. This next usage, also Isaiah quoting JAH, says this:

"For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I [am] the LORD; and [there is] none else." (Isaiah 45:18)

So here we have Jah Himself saying, that He did not create the earth "Tohu va Bohu". And since we already know, that the words describe a situation after the judgement of the Most High, we might get an indication as to what really happened, somewhere between "In The Beginning" and the first day of the week in Genesis.

Jeremiah helps us out. He was taken to that time, before mankind was created. He describes a situation that is in no way like the ones creationists describe when they make God in their image, a God that creates empty things. Take a look:

"I beheld the earth, and, lo, [it was] without form, and void; and the heavens, and they [had] no light. I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved lightly. I beheld, and, lo, [there was] no man, and all the birds of the heavens were fled. I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place [was] a wilderness, and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the LORD, [and] by his fierce anger. For thus hath the LORD said, The whole land shall be desolate; yet will I not make a full end." (Jeremiah 4:23-27)

Obviously, we speak about a situation that is not the original creation, even though Jeremiah is taken to that time when the earth was Tohu va Bohu in Genesis 1:1. It is obvious, that the earth became Tohu va Bohu!

So, now we have Jah Himself saying that He did not create the earth in this situation, we have two accounts that tell us Tohu va Bohu is a situation after a judgement of Jah, and we have Jeremiah who speaks about this time in more detail.

Jeremiah specifically says "there is no man", but he also speaks about "cities". He speaks about a civilization on this planet before mankind was ever created!

Creationists deny all of this. They obscured the translation in the King James Version in the very first sentence of the very first chapter of the very first book, and with that, they have created God in their image: a God that cannot create anything, for you cannot create emptiness.

Now, other than the fact that it is more than interesting to realize that there were civilizations before mankind was created, it is equally so that the God of the creationists is not the God that wrote the Bible in the original language. And not only because it is an oxymoron to "create emptiness".

A couple of months ago I wrote about Sodomy, which most people think is another word for homosexuality where the Bible uses the word heteros to describe what the Sodomites were doing. Here, too, do we see that very same God of the creationists at work. Their denial of the fact that there are more intelligent beings than just mankind, leads to their painting of a God Who makes people pay for His... mistakes!

We see the same God, who is sorry that He created mankind and since He seems to be unable to master time, He can do nothing but wiping out His creation with a flood. That is not the Almighty JAH that I know, that is not the perfect JAH that I know!

We can go on, for example, and look to the battles of Israel against the Canaanites as described in Exodus and so on. We can look at JAH telling the Israelites to kill other human beings, or we can look at the original text and read how these were not human beings at all but descendants of the Nephilim, unholy offspring of angelic beings with daughters of men.

All of this, however, is lost to the creationists who do not seem to be able to grasp that although mankind is created in the Image of JAH, this by no means means that (wo)man is the only intelligent being in creation and that human civilization is all that ever was in Jah's creation.

It is clear, that the KJV is not 100% correct. The mistranslations start already in the very first line. How important is it, to know Jah personally in order to understand just what is written in the Bible, especially when you consider these mistranslations? Asking this question is answering it.